Sex dating in brentsville virginia
The same parent plans to request removal of six other books from the library, including (Challenged at the Leesburg, Fla.
Public Library  because of sexual innuendo, drug references, and other adult topics.
A complaint was filed because of "racial slurs" and profanity used throughout the novel.
School District  provided it has a label designating it as appropriate for high school students.
Younger students could also access the book with prior parental permission.
Newton High School has required students to read the book since at least the early 1980s.
In neighboring Des Moines, it is on the recommended reading list for ninth-grade English, and it is used for some special education students in the eleventh and twelfth grades.The Do D then purchased and destroyed all 9,500 first edition copies citing concerns that it contained classified information. Martin's Press, in conjunction with the Do D created a censored second edition, which contains blackened out words, lines, paragraphs, and even portions of the index.)("Trash." "Obscene, indecent, and impure, and taken as a whole, predominantly prurient, hardcore pornography and utterly without redeeming social importance." "Trash written by a mentally sick individual." Banned by Boston courts in 1962 for obscenity, but the decision was reversed in 1966 by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.)(Challenged at the Nampa, Idaho Public Library  along with seven other books because "they are very pornographic in nature and they have very explicit and detailed illustrations and photographs which we feel don't belong in a library." The library board approved policy changes that restrict children's access to any holdings that may fall under the state's harmful to minors statute and barred the library from buying movies rated NC-17 or X.